<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Only Counting Brand Mentions the Enemy of Social Listening?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.networkedinsights.com/index.php/2009/08/is-only-counting-brand-mentions-the-enemy-of-social-listening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.networkedinsights.com/index.php/2009/08/is-only-counting-brand-mentions-the-enemy-of-social-listening/</link>
	<description>Fueling Intelligent Brands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 23:12:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Bastien</title>
		<link>http://blog.networkedinsights.com/index.php/2009/08/is-only-counting-brand-mentions-the-enemy-of-social-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-1431</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Bastien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.networkedinsights.com/?p=4671#comment-1431</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re saying all the right things here. I love it.

&quot;Monitoring solutions rely on keywords - that means that you will find what you look for.&quot;

This is something I&#039;ve said before in one of my posts as well, the challenge with tools that only give you keyword results, is that it&#039;s almost impossible to find insights, since you can&#039;t search for unknown unknowns!

From all the data you get by searching for brand name, getting insights would require sitting down and scanning over 100s of posts manually. Which is the reason for using a tool in the first place.

People are also bad with coming up with patterns, two problems being prejudice and sample size. Too much of the time the &quot;person&quot; will cloud what are the actual trends, and other times all the manual work means only very small samples of data can be used.

Great post. I&#039;m looking forward to more discussion on this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re saying all the right things here. I love it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Monitoring solutions rely on keywords &#8211; that means that you will find what you look for.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is something I&#8217;ve said before in one of my posts as well, the challenge with tools that only give you keyword results, is that it&#8217;s almost impossible to find insights, since you can&#8217;t search for unknown unknowns!</p>
<p>From all the data you get by searching for brand name, getting insights would require sitting down and scanning over 100s of posts manually. Which is the reason for using a tool in the first place.</p>
<p>People are also bad with coming up with patterns, two problems being prejudice and sample size. Too much of the time the &#8220;person&#8221; will cloud what are the actual trends, and other times all the manual work means only very small samples of data can be used.</p>
<p>Great post. I&#8217;m looking forward to more discussion on this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->