<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chutes and Ladders and Social-Media Listening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.networkedinsights.com/index.php/2010/01/chutes-and-ladders-and-social-media-listening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.networkedinsights.com/index.php/2010/01/chutes-and-ladders-and-social-media-listening/</link>
	<description>Fueling Intelligent Brands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 23:12:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Wittes Schlack</title>
		<link>http://blog.networkedinsights.com/index.php/2010/01/chutes-and-ladders-and-social-media-listening/comment-page-1/#comment-2553</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Wittes Schlack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.networkedinsights.com/?p=5689#comment-2553</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, Dan, and would take your argument one step further. &quot;Listening&quot; should not be used interchangeably with brand monitoring and tracking, and &quot;passively listening&quot; (which is how Neff&#039;s article quite accurately describes web mining) should not be confused with *active* listening. There&#039;s undoubtedly a lot to be gained by harvesting and trying to synthesize the postings of social media active consumers, but as we&#039;ve learned through our work with private online communities, there&#039;s a world more to be learned by visibly, transparently, and actively engaging in *dialogue,* in authentic give-and-take, with consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, Dan, and would take your argument one step further. &#8220;Listening&#8221; should not be used interchangeably with brand monitoring and tracking, and &#8220;passively listening&#8221; (which is how Neff&#8217;s article quite accurately describes web mining) should not be confused with *active* listening. There&#8217;s undoubtedly a lot to be gained by harvesting and trying to synthesize the postings of social media active consumers, but as we&#8217;ve learned through our work with private online communities, there&#8217;s a world more to be learned by visibly, transparently, and actively engaging in *dialogue,* in authentic give-and-take, with consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->